Dear Billy T and Somerville/Medford News Weekly Speakup Line,

The defense claims Chloe caused those injuries to his arm. The prosecution claimed an exploding taillight did it. None of the 40+ pieces of taillight “found” had any blood or tissue on it, according to Hanley testimony. There were no pieces caught in his clothing. There were only “microscopic” pieces found on the shirt, the shirt that Proctor stored in the same bag as the taillight “evidence” for 6 weeks before turning it in to lab.

The prosecution’s case is based on Magic taillight, Proctor deleting exculpatory videos, a shifting timeline that is now on its 4th iteration, taking quotes out of context to manipulate jurors and attempting to turn sympathy into evidence, and so on, and so on, and so on.

Harold Baird Facebook poster